密集烤房溫濕度自控設(shè)備應(yīng)用對(duì)比分析
Comparative Analysis on Different Temperature and Humidity Auto-control Equipment of Bulk Curing Barn
-
摘要: 對(duì)7種密集烤房溫濕度自控設(shè)備進(jìn)行了應(yīng)用對(duì)比試驗(yàn),。結(jié)果表明：①基本性能方面，控制點(diǎn)以設(shè)備JKM-B,、TMC-4為最多,；穩(wěn)定性以設(shè)備QZK3000-82、ARC-III,、BZK為好,；操作難易程度除設(shè)備BZK,、KX200較難外,，其它比較容易；②能耗方面,，設(shè)備ARC-III,、TMC-4能耗最高，設(shè)備BZK,、SWP-ZN-C3最低,，設(shè)備QZK3000-82,、JKM-B、KX200中等,；③溫濕度自控方面,，7種設(shè)備都能夠滿足煙葉烘烤要求，控制效果較好,；④烤后煙葉質(zhì)量方面,，設(shè)備QZK3000-82、ARC-III與密集烤房配套能獲得較好的煙葉烘烤質(zhì)量,。綜合評(píng)價(jià),，設(shè)備ARC-III和QZK3000-82二者的性能表現(xiàn)較為突出，但各自的穩(wěn)定性和實(shí)用性仍有待提高,。Abstract: An experiment was carried out to investigate the performances of seven temperature and humidity auto-control equipment in bulk curing barn. Results showed that JKM-B and TMC-4 had more control-points than others, while the stability of QZK3000-82, ARC-III and BZK was superior to others. QZK3000-82, JKM-B, ARC-III, TMC-4 and SWP-ZN-C3 were easily handled while E and F were difficult. ARC-III and TMC-4 had the highest energy consumption, BZK and SWP-ZN-C3 the lowest, while QZK3000-82, JKM-B and KX200 the medium. The seven equipments in the experiment exhibited favorable control capacity to meet the reqirement of tobacco leaf curing. Cured leaves with high quality were obtained in the bulk curing barn with QZK3000-82 or ARC-III. The performances of ARC-III and QZK3000-82 were superior to the others in comprehensive evaluation.
下載: